ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Endoscopic surgery combined with titanium mesh for infantile solitary orbital myofibroma: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To report the clinical features, misdiagnosis process and minimally invasive treatment experience of endoscopy combined with titanium mesh in a 3-year-old infant with isolated orbital myofibroma, and to discuss the key points of differential diagnosis and treatment strategy. Case report: A 3-year-old male patient presented with progressive swelling of the left lower eyelid for 1 month, without eye redness, eye pain, diplopia, or ocular motility disturbance. There was no significant family history or past medical history. Ophthalmic examination revealed visual acuity of 0.5 in the right eye and 0.6 in the left eye. Swelling was observed in the right face and the lower eyelid, with a palpable mass that was well-mobile, firm in texture, and non-tender. The ocular positions were normal with regular motility, while anterior segment examination and fundoscopy showed no abnormalities. Imaging information indicated a well-defined oval mass (1.5 cm × 2.1 cm) in the infraorbital foramen area of the anterior wall of the right maxillary sinus, accompanied by erosion and destruction of the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Because of the imaging features and frozen section were highly similar to those of schwannoma, both presenting as well-defined spindle cell tumors, a misdiagnosis of "right orbital schwannoma" was identified. However, that misdiagnosis did not alter the surgical approach. We performed endoscopic microsurgery to achieve precise resection and avoid damaging normal tissues. Meanwhile, a titanium mesh was implanted to reconstruct the orbital bone defect, restoring its anatomical structure and function. Intraoperative frozen section showed a spindle cell tumor, which tended to be diagnosed as schwannoma. Postoperative immunohistochemistry indicated SMA (+), Calponin (+), Ki-67 (+, proliferation index of 20%), Desmin (-), S-100 (-), CD34 (-), CK (-), leading to the final diagnosis of infantile solitary orbital myofibroma. Conclusion: Infantile orbital myofibroma is clinically rare and frequently misdiagnosed as schwannoma, which requires immunohistochemical and molecular genetic testing for definitive diagnosis. Endoscopic minimally invasive techniques demonstrate significant advantages in preserving normal tissues. Titanium mesh can effectively reconstruct orbital bone defects and restore anatomical structure and function. However, long-term follow-up is required to monitor its potential impact on maxillofacial development in infants and young children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.