Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606772›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2025

Life Cycle Assessment: A Primer for Kidney Professionals.

Saba Yousafzai, Rehan Sadiq, Kasun Hewage, Andrea J MacNeill, Caroline E Stigant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saba YousafzaiLife Cycle Management Laboratory, School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
Rehan SadiqLife Cycle Management Laboratory, School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
Kasun HewageLife Cycle Management Laboratory, School of Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
Andrea J MacNeillDepartment of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Caroline E StigantDivision of Nephrology, Island Health Authority, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-0966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The growing emphasis on low-carbon, sustainable health care systems is driving the integration of environmental sustainability into clinical practice and research. This shift necessitates clinician literacy in health care sustainability, particularly in methodologies for assessing environmental impacts. Objective: To introduce health care professionals to life cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool for evaluating environmental impacts in clinical contexts and to illustrate its application through a case study on hemodialysis therapies. Design: A qualitative assessment of LCA methodology, including its fundamental principles, stages, and applications in health care. Setting: Hemodialysis materials were collected from In-Centre and Home Dialysis units at Vancouver General Hospital. Patients/Sample/Participants: No patients are directly involved in this work; samples of unused hemodialysis materials were collected for process assessment. The target audience is health care professionals, particularly those involved in kidney care, who need to interpret LCA results for informed decision-making. Methods: Overview of LCA, an internationally standardized methodology that evaluates the environmental impacts of products and processes over their entire life cycle, is presented. The 4 stages of LCA, the key environmental impact categories it assesses, and guidelines for appropriate interpretation and use are explored. Results: Life cycle assessment provides numerous midpoint data, mechanisms by which damages occur to endpoints, including human health and environments. The case study comparing home versus in-center hemodialysis demonstrates how LCA findings can inform decision-making in kidney care. Limitations: The interpretation of LCA results requires an understanding of its methodology and limitations. The accuracy of LCA outcomes depends on the quality and scope of data used in the assessment. Conclusions: As LCA is increasingly applied in clinical settings, health care professionals must develop the skills to critically evaluate and apply its findings. This primer equips kidney care professionals with essential knowledge of LCA methodology, supporting the integration of environmental sustainability into clinical practice. Trial Registration: Not applicable.

Indexed as

climate changeenvironmental impactskidney carelife cycle assessmentsustainability

Identifiers

PMID40606772
PMCPMC12214306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.