Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606743›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Key volatile off-flavor compounds identification in chicken meat and deodorizing effects of polyphenol and spice extracts.

Houqi Ning, Aiping Yang, Wenjing Zhou, Songling Li, Yifang Tang, Wenbo Ma, Ping Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Houqi NingSchool of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.
Aiping YangSchool of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.
Wenjing ZhouSchool of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.
Songling LiSchool of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.
Yifang TangSchool of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.
Wenbo MaSchool of psychiatry, North Sichuan medical college, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Ping LiuSchool of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, 610039, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study identified key volatile off-flavor compounds in chicken meat. Flavor compounds were analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC × GC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-olfactometry (GC-O-MS). Eighteen volatile flavor compounds (odor activity values ≥1, flavor intensity ≥2) in various chicken meat were found, and green leg chicken has the highest number of selected flavor compounds (14). These 14 compounds were individually incorporated into a flavorless chicken matrix and quantitatively analyzed by GC × GC-MS. Thirteen key flavor compounds were determined and further validated through recombination and omission experiments. Six key off-flavor compounds, 1-octen-3-ol, heptanal, hexanal, nonanal, decanal, dodecanal, were identified. Besides, polyphenol and spice extracts significantly reduced off-flavors in chicken, particularly tea polyphenol. It decreased thiobarbituric acid (TBA) levels and off-flavor values of chicken meat by 90.6 % and 55.6 %, as well as the concentration of 6 key off-flavor compounds (

Indexed as

Chicken meatDeodorizing effectsKey volatile off-flavor compoundsPolyphenol and spice extracts

Identifiers

PMID40606743
PMCPMC12221506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.