SynthesisThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2025
Combined Surgical Dislocations and Proximal Femoral Osteotomies for Treatment of Complex Proximal Femoral Deformities: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complex proximal femoral deformities such as slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFE) or residual Perthes disease pose challenging clinical problems due to the severity of pathological femoral head and neck changes from long-standing childhood disease. Utilizing the combination of surgical dislocation (SD) and proximal femoral osteotomy (PFO) is an option to address both the intra-articular pathologies as well as the maximal correction of the proximal femoral deformities. The purpose of this systematic review was to report clinical and radiographical outcomes for patients undergoing these combined procedures. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed utilizing PRISMA guidelines. Databases queried were PubMed, OVID Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov from their dates of inception to 7/03/2024. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for patients undergoing combined SDs and PFOs. Each study's data was manually retrieved from the full-text manuscript. The study design, surgical technique, indications, demographic and radiographic data, outcomes, and complications of each study were analyzed. Results: There were six case series (Evidence Level IV) included in this review. There were 132 patients (46% female) with mean age of 16.5 years (range: 9-30). Etiologies were most commonly SCFE (50.8%) and Perthes (31.8%). Mean follow-up was 40.1 months (range: 3-127). The mHHS improved from 61.9±4.5 to 84.8±6.7. Complication rates were low at 11.4% with the most common complication being instrumentation failure (20%). Lateral slip angles improved from 58.5°±6.5° to 14.4 ±3.6° in 42 patients who underwent combined SD/PFO for SCFE. Alpha angles improved from 86.7°±6.7° to 50.9°±4.8°. Articular-trochanteric distance improved from 0.7±4.5mm to 23.4±3.1mm. Conclusion: Combined SDs and PFO's should be considered a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe femoral head and neck pathologies which were more likely from long-standing childhood diseases instead of severe deformities in the setting of SCFE or residual Perthes. This review demonstrated positive radiographic and clinical outcomes when these patients are treated, as well as a low complication and AVN rate. Further research should continue to study the combined approach in larger cohorts and at longer-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40606717PMC12212341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.