ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Anatomical morphometry of the proximal humerus in the Vietnamese population: A comparative study using multiplanar computed tomography and cadaveric dissection.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fractures of the proximal humerus are prevalent among the elderly, often posing challenges in anatomical reconstruction and internal fixation. Precise anatomical knowledge tailored to specific populations is essential for optimal surgical outcomes. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the anatomical characteristics of the proximal humerus in the Vietnamese population through multiplanar computed tomography (CT) and cadaveric measurements, and to determine the consistency between the two modalities. Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 75 CT scans and 30 shoulder specimens from 15 fresh cadavers. Parameters measured included the neck-shaft angle, diameters of the humeral head (superior-inferior and anterior-posterior), width of the greater tuberosity, deltoid tuberosity index, and distances from the greater tuberosity to anatomical landmarks such as the lesser tuberosity, bicipital groove, and pectoralis major insertion. Results: The average neck-shaft angle was 132.36° ± 2.44°, with most values within 130°-140°. The deltoid tuberosity index averaged 1.76 ± 0.20, exceeding thresholds reported in previous studies. No statistically significant differences were found between CT and cadaveric measurements across most parameters (p > 0.05). The anatomical measurements were found to be smaller than those reported in Western populations but comparable to other Asian populations. Conclusion: The study confirms that CT imaging provides reliable and accurate morphometric data comparable to cadaveric dissection. Key anatomical landmarks such as the pectoralis major insertion, lesser tuberosity, and bicipital groove can serve as consistent intraoperative references for implant positioning in Vietnamese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.