Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606612›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Comparative analysis of thrombocytopenia incidence in patients treated with generic vs. brand-name linezolid: a cohort study utilizing hospital electronic medical records.

Zhizhou Wang, Ke Wang, Yiming Hua, Xin Hu, Xiaotong Zhang, Xiaoxi Li, Xiaoxuan Xing, Yingnan Feng, Chao Wu, Zhichao Zhang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhizhou WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ke WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yiming HuaDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xin HuCollege of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Xiaotong ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxi LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxuan XingDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yingnan FengDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chao WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhichao ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Xianzhe DongDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lan ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the hematological safety of generic linezolid, providing data to support its rational and safe use in clinical practice. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records at a tertiary hospital in China between January 2019 and June 2023. We conducted a real-world, retrospective matched cohort study involving hospitalized patients treated with either generic or brand-name linezolid for bacterial infections. Propensity score matching was employed to control for potential risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia. The primary outcome was the incidence of thrombocytopenia adverse events. Secondary outcomes included rates of severe thrombocytopenia, the incidence of anemia meeting transfusion thresholds, and changes in platelet counts (PLTs) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels during follow-up. Results: A total of 218 patients received generic linezolid, while 222 patients received the brand-name version. After adjustment, each group had 137 patients. There were no significant differences in thrombocytopenia (28.44% vs. 21.17%), severe thrombocytopenia (6.42% vs. 4.95%), or anemia rates (2.75% vs. 3.15%) (P > 0.05). Similarly, reductions in PLT and HB levels during follow-up did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Our results indicate no significant differences in the incidence of thrombocytopenia and severe anemia between generic and brand-name linezolid, highlighting the need for further validation in other generic formulations and diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

anemiaAntibacterial agentsbrand-name druggeneric druglinezolidsafetythrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID40606612
PMCPMC12213584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.