Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606594›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025

Preliminary Radiographic Classification of First Metatarsal Osteotomy Healing Following Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery.

Thomas L Lewis, Sanjana Mehrotra, Jonathan Kaplan, Tyler Gonzalez, Sergio Morales, Thomas J Goff, Vikramman Vignaraja, Ayla Claire Newton, Robbie Ray, Peter Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas L LewisOrthopaedics and Arthritis Specialist Centre, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4167-7427
Sanjana MehrotraSheffield Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Jonathan KaplanDuke University Orthopedics, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0821-7939
Tyler GonzalezSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3210-8097
Sergio MoralesOrthopedic Surgery Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7766-4097
Thomas J GoffMid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0330-5825
Vikramman VignarajaKing's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-8571
Ayla Claire NewtonKing's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Robbie RayKing's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7411-9720
Peter LamOrthopaedics and Arthritis Specialist Centre, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7934-6546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive or percutaneous surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus correction has seen increased adoption because of a growing evidence base of positive clinical and radiographic outcomes following surgery. However, no standardized or validated radiographic classification exists to evaluate the first metatarsal osteotomy healing following MIS hallux valgus surgery. The aim was to develop a new radiographic classification system for assessing bone healing following MIS distal transverse osteotomy for hallux valgus. Methods: A 4-domain radiographic classification system based on callus formation, anteroposterior (AP) osteotomy line, lateral osteotomy line, and remodeling for MIS osteotomy healing was developed and tested on a cohort of 27 feet that underwent percutaneous transverse osteotomy for hallux valgus correction. Patients had simultaneous postoperative weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and standard radiographs following surgery. Five surgeons reviewed anonymized radiographs to evaluate interobserver reliability. WBCT was used to confirm union status and classification interpretation. Results: The classification system demonstrated substantial interobserver reliability for lateral osteotomy line (Fleiss kappa = 0.671, 95% CI 0.505-0.814) and AP osteotomy line assessment (Fleiss kappa = 0.664, 95% CI 0.459-0.811), with moderate agreement for callus formation (κ = 0.465) and remodeling (κ = 0.439). The classification showed strong correlation with WBCT findings, with an optimal threshold of 8 points identified to differentiate union from nonunion, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 85.2%. This finding was supported by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.832. At the optimal threshold, the classification demonstrated 90.0% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity for detecting union. Conclusion: This preliminary classification provides a reliable tool for assessing first metatarsal bone healing following MIS hallux valgus osteotomies, with substantial interobserver reliability. It offers a standardized approach for radiographic evaluation, which may enhance comparability across studies and serve as a radiographic research tool pending further validation. Its clinical applicability remains to be determined. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.

Indexed as

bone healingclassification systemhallux valgusinterobserver reliabilityminimally invasive surgerypercutaneous osteotomyradiographic assessmentreliabilityROC curveweightbearing CT

Identifiers

PMID40606594
PMCPMC12214334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.