Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606569›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2025

Local laser fluence estimation in optical resolution optoacoustic angiography employing calibrated ultrasound detector.

Daria Voitovich, Alexey Kurnikov, Anna Orlova, Aleksej Petushkov, Liubov Shimolina, Anastasia Komarova, Marina Shirmanova, Yu-Hang Liu, Daniel Razansky, Pavel Subochev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daria VoitovichInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ulyanov Str., Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Alexey KurnikovInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ulyanov Str., Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Anna OrlovaInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ulyanov Str., Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Aleksej PetushkovInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ulyanov Str., Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.
Liubov ShimolinaInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.
Anastasia KomarovaInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.
Marina ShirmanovaInstitute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod 603005, Russia.
Yu-Hang LiuInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, UZH Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, Zurich 8006, Switzerland.
Daniel RazanskyInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, UZH Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, Zurich 8006, Switzerland.
Pavel SubochevInstitute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 46 Ulyanov Str., Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical-resolution optoacoustic (photoacoustic) microscopy is a hybrid imaging modality combining focused optical excitation with ultrasound detection, thus achieving micrometer-scale spatial resolution and high-contrast angiographic imaging. Despite these important advantages, maintaining safe laser fluence levels is essential to prevent tissue damage while ensuring sufficient detection sensitivity. Here, we introduce a model that directly relates the detector's noise-equivalent pressure (NEP) to the local laser fluence at the imaged blood vessel. The model incorporates acoustic propagation effects from an optoacoustic source to a spherically focused detector with limited aperture and bandwidth, offering a more comprehensive understanding of how fluence and ultrasonic sensitivity are interconnected. The effects of ultrasound generation propagation and detection were accounted for using analytical estimations and numerical simulations, while detector's NEP was experimentally measured with a calibrated hydrophone. The proposed model for evaluating of local laser fluence with a calibrated ultrasound detector was validated through in vitro experiments with superficially located blood layer and numerical Monte Carlo/k-Wave simulations featuring deeper vessels. In vivo experiments employing 532 nm laser excitation and wideband 1-30 MHz ultrasonic detection further demonstrated the model's capacity for real-time adjustments of laser parameters to ensure tissue safety.

Indexed as

Laser fluenceLocal temperatureNoise equivalent laser fluenceNoise equivalent pressureOptical-resolution optoacoustic (photoacoustic) microscopySafety limit

Identifiers

PMID40606569
PMCPMC12214255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.