Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606555›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025

Implementation of a hospice community service redesign: Qualitative research identifying lessons learned.

Kate Sugar, Candy McCabe, Alison Llewellyn, Wayne de Leeuw, Maggie Crowe, Claire Prendergast, Charlotte Spence, Natasha Bradley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate SugarDorothy House Hospice Care, Bradford on Avon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0274-4574
Candy McCabeDorothy House Hospice Care, Bradford on Avon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3593-0027
Alison LlewellynCentre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8769-832X
Wayne de LeeuwDorothy House Hospice Care, Bradford on Avon, UK.
Maggie CroweDorothy House Hospice Care, Bradford on Avon, UK.
Claire PrendergastDorothy House Hospice Care, Bradford on Avon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0672-227X
Charlotte SpenceDorothy House Hospice Care, Bradford on Avon, UK.
Natasha BradleyMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0768-9819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The need to improve equity of access to palliative care is well recognized; however, much less is known about how new models of hospice community services can be successfully introduced. Aim: We aimed to capture learning from the implementation experiences of hospice stakeholders during the first 12 months of a hospice community services redesign. Design: Qualitative research using individual semi-structured interviews ( Methods: Participants were clinical and non-clinical staff, hospice leaders, volunteers, and external stakeholders. Interviews were analysed with framework analysis using Normalisation Process Theory. Focus groups were used to confirm and prioritise recommendations. Results: Implementation is more likely to be successful where hospice personnel are enabled to work together in understanding and adapting to new ways of working. Participants gave examples of being supported to plan activities, to form networks of participation, to pilot new ways of working, and to appraise and improve their work. Receiving feedback on progress is beneficial. Implementation strategies that are tailored to each context could be effective if they engage with hospice stakeholders to ensure that strategic aims are well-understood and that the necessary resources are available. Positive experiences of implementation are more likely where stakeholders understand the changes and can participate in planning. Where necessary, changes to human resources and technology support systems would ideally be adopted prior to making changes to patient-facing services. Conclusion: This study contributes knowledge from a charitable provider of specialist palliative care during the implementation of a hospice community service redesign. We identified opportunities for future improvement, particularly regarding communication, planning, prioritisation, and feedback. Investment of time and reflection during implementation can support the ambition of hospices to become integrated within a place-based system, to improve access to palliative care within the communities they serve. We report key implementation recommendations for organisations considering service redesign.

Indexed as

change managementcommunity palliative carehospiceimplementationservice redesign

Identifiers

PMID40606555
PMCPMC12214322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.