ReviewJournal of toxicologic pathology2025
Report of the AI Pathology Task Force, Non-clinical Evaluation Expert Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association: an overview of recent publications about AI pathology.
Review in Journal of toxicologic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in non-clinical pathology is rapidly expanding. In this study, we conducted a literature survey of articles published after 2017 that used AI to analyze the histopathological images of experimental animals. We identified 44 articles that used AI for various purposes, including the detection of abnormal sites, determination and quantification of normal tissues, and classification of normal/abnormal images. AI systems or applications were either custom-built, commercially available, or a combination of both. Rats and mice were mainly used, and the liver was the most frequently analyzed organ. Our findings suggest that AI can be useful in non-clinical pathology and that collaboration between pharmaceutical companies or cooperation with IT experts can be a potential approach to further advance the utilization of AI in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.