ReviewGlobal health & medicine2025
Creation and use of an index of the emergency resilience of urban public health management in China.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemic trends and characteristics of notifiable infectious diseases in mainland China during the COVID-19: a nationwide surveillance study, 2020-2024.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Viewpoints of community committee workers on public health emergency management in urban communities: a Q methodology study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes a framework for emergency resilience based on a review of the literature and theoretical analysis. On this basis, the Delphi method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process have been used to create an index of the emergency resilience of urban public health management. This index includes 6 primary indicators, 22 secondary indicators, and 93 tertiary indicators. An evaluation using the created index indicated that Shanghai's public health emergency management scored 82 out of 100, which is generally a good score. However, there are still problems such as the lack of specificity and implementability in emergency plans, the lack of diversification of reserves of emergency supplies, the low degree of sharing emergency information and cooperation, failure to capitalize on the advantages of traditional Chinese medicine, and the shortage of public health personnel in local communities. Overall, the index of the emergency resilience of urban public health management as was created from the perspective of preventing and controlling major infectious diseases is scientific and reliable, and it can effectively evaluate the current state of emergency management in urban public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.