ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Advancing 1.5T MR imaging: toward achieving 3T quality through deep learning super-resolution techniques.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Orientation-Aware Diffusion Super-Resolution for 3T-Like Fetal MRI from Routine 1.5T Scans.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A 3T MRI scanner delivers enhanced image quality and SNR, minimizing artifacts to provide superior high-resolution brain images compared to a 1.5T MRI. Thus, making it vitally important for diagnosing complex neurological conditions. However, its higher cost of acquisition and operation, increased sensitivity to image distortions, greater noise levels, and limited accessibility in many healthcare settings present notable challenges. These factors impact heterogeneity in MRI neuroimaging data on account of the uneven distribution of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners across healthcare institutions. Methods: In our study, we investigated the efficacy of three deep learning-based super-resolution techniques to enhance 1.5T MRI images, aiming to achieve quality analogous to 3T scans. These synthetic and "upgraded" 1.5T images were compared and assessed against their 3T counterparts using a range of image quality assessment metrics. Specifically, we employed metrics such as the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS), and Intensity Differences in Pixels (IDP) to evaluate the similitude and visual quality of the enhanced images. Results: According to our experimental results it has been exhibited that among the three evaluated deep learning-based super-resolution techniques, the Transformer Enhanced Generative Adversarial Network (TCGAN) significantly outperformed the others. To reduce pixel differences, enhance image sharpness, and preserve essential anatomical details TCGAN performed efficaciously. Discussion: This approach presents TCGAN offers a cost-effective and widely accessible alternative for generating high-quality images without the need for expensive, high-field MRI scans and leads to inconsistencies and complicate data comparison and harmonization challenges across studies utilizing various scanners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.