ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Plant disease classification in the wild using vision transformers and mixture of experts.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A knowledge-driven unified framework for plant disease classification and severity grading via domain adaptation.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- A Dual-Side Synergistic LoRA Framework for Full-Chain Fine-Tuning of Qwen2.5-VL for Plant Disease Diagnosis.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GreenAid: a confidence-weighted ensemble deep learning system for real-time plant disease detection and management.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Beyond the Visual Spectrum: From RGB-Based Learning to Hyperspectral Intelligence for Plant Disease Detection-Challenges and Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Survey of Crop Disease Recognition Methods Based on Spectral and RGB Images.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- A resource-efficient framework for plant disease classification: integrating reduced-order modeling with treatment-based label engineering.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- MRC-Net: a reliable plant disease classification framework with multi-frequency state-space enhancement and conformal prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A paradigm-level evaluation of deep learning architectures for plant pest and disease recognition under data-scarce field conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant disease classification using deep learning techniques has shown promising results, especially when models are trained on high-quality images. However, these models often suffer from a significant drop in their accuracies when tested in real-world agricultural settings. In the wild, models encounter images that are significantly different from the training data in aspects like lighting conditions, capturing conditions, image resolution, and the severity of disease. This discrepancy between the training images and images in-the-wild conditions poses a major challenge for deploying these models in agricultural settings. In this paper, we present a novel approach to address this issue by combining a Vision Transformer backbone with a Mixture of Experts, where multiple expert models are trained to specialize in different aspects of the input data, and a gating mechanism is implemented to select the most relevant experts for each input. The use of Mixture of Experts allows the model to dynamically allocate specialized experts to different types of input data, improving model performance across diverse image conditions. The approach significantly improves performance on diverse datasets that contain a range of image capturing conditions and disease severities. Furthermore, the model incorporates entropy regularization and orthogonal regularization, aiming to enhance the robustness and generalization capabilities. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieved a 20% improvement in accuracy compared to Vision Transformer (ViT). Furthermore, it demonstrated a 68% accuracy on cross-domain datasets like PlantVillage to PlantDoc, surpassing baseline models such as InceptionV3 and EfficientNet. This highlights the potential of our model for effective deployment in dynamic agricultural environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.