ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Interpretable machine learning model for identification and risk factor of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and its association with nutritional inflammatory index: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- Inflammatory hematologic indices in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study focusing on the aggregate index of systemic inflammation.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) poses significant risks to both maternal and neonatal health. This study aims to construct a risk factor prediction model related to PROM by using machine learning technology and explore the association with nutritional inflammatory index. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with PROM. Based on the variables screened out by ridge regression and Boruta algorithm, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were further adopted. According to the sample data, it is divided into the training set and the internal validation set in a ratio of 7:3. The research group adopted four machine learning algorithms: Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF). The selected variables were incorporated into model construction, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) serving as a criterion for model selection. Model performance was assessed using AUC values, sensitivity, specificity, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. The variables were selected based on the contribution degree of the variables in Shapley additive Interpretation (SHAP) to construct the nomogram. Results: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 800 parturients at Binhai County People's Hospital from January 2023 to October 2024, comprising 400 with PROM and 400 with normal delivery. The RF model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.757, sensitivity of 67.4%, and specificity of 65.1%. Key predictive factors identified included body mass index (BMI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), platelet, albumin, and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI). The ROC of the model also showed good efficacy, with an AUC of 0.777. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of machine learning in enhancing the understanding and prediction of PROM, and emphasizes the significance of inflammatory and nutritional indicators, paving the way for future research in maternal-fetal medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.