ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The learning curve of V-NOTES hysterectomy: a single-surgeon experience.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approaches: Comparative Learning Curves and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus V-NOTES Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Concomitant Hysterectomy and vNOTES-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Feasible and Safe Scarless Approach for Apical Prolapse Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- V-Notes Sentinel Lymph Node Staging for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Bilateral Salpingectomy for Sterilization: A Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopy and vNOTES.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) has emerged as an innovative surgical approach that combines the advantages of endoscopic surgery with those of the vaginal approach. This article presents the initial experience of a single institution in implementing the V-NOTES technique for hysterectomy procedures. Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed the first 139 V-NOTES hysterectomies performed by a single surgeon at 000 from 2021 to 2024. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were recorded. Operative time (OT) served as an indicator of surgical proficiency. The learning curve was analyzed using the cumulative sum method of operative time (CUSUMot). Results: The mean OT was 59.32 ± 21.13 min. No patient required conversion to laparotomy or conventional laparoscopy. The CUSUMot analysis demonstrated four phases in the learning curve: initiation (12 patients; mean OT, 66.17 ± 12.84 min), consolidation (41 patients; mean OT, 54.32 ± 13.96 min), complexification (54 patients; mean OT, 64.46 ± 25.48 min), and mastery (32 patients; mean OT, 54.5 ± 21.11 min). Additionally, the study identified a history of cesarean section and the absence of vaginal delivery as two risk factors for bladder injury. Conclusion: This study identifies a four-phase learning curve for V-NOTES hysterectomy, with initial competency achieved after 12 cases and sufficient mastery reached after 53 cases for an experienced surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.