SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of agents for IgA nephropathy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of response and long-term tolerability of sparsentan in a real-world IgA nephropathy cohort.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in the Management of IgA Nephropathy: From Supportive Care to Targeted Therapies.Cureus · 2026Review
- Recent Advancements in the Therapeutic Landscape of IgA Nephropathy and the Impact of Dual Blockers: Telitacicept.Kidney medicine · 2026Review
- IgA Nephropathy: Mechanisms, Risk Stratification, and Precision Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) globally, with its pathological mechanisms closely related to mucosal immune abnormalities and complement activation. Currently, there is no curative treatment. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy differences of existing treatment regimens on clinical remission (CR), 24-h urinary protein excretion (24-h UPE), ESRD or kidney damage (KD) and adverse events (AEs) in IgAN, providing evidence-based support for optimizing stratified treatment strategies. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to February 20, 2025, including 57 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) covering 19 interventions. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were employed to assess binary variable (CR, ESRD or KD, AEs) using risk ratios (RR) and continuous variable (24-h UPE) using standardized mean differences (SMD), with interventions ranked based on the area under the cumulative ranking curve. Results: Clinical remission (26 RCTs included in the analysis): The CR for tonsillectomy combined with steroids pulse therapy (TSP) (RR = 8.23, 95% CI 4.11-16.45), anti-APRIL monoclonal antibody sibeprenlimab (RR = 10.00, 1.34-74.48), and steroids combined with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (STE + RASI) (RR = 5.03, 2.61-9.68) were significantly superior to placebo. Proteinuria control (36 studies assessing 24-h UPE): The BLyS/APRIL dual-target inhibitor telitacicept (SMD = -5.21, -7.55 to -2.87) and STE + RASI (SMD = -1.98, -3.15 to -0.82) significantly reduced 24-h UPE, outperforming the mycophenolate mofetil combined with steroids regimen (SMD = -0.97, -2.74 to 0.80). Renal endpoint events (26 studies analyzing ESKD or KD): STE + RASI reduced the risk of ESKD or KD by 98.1% (optimal SUCRA ranking), followed by the dual endothelin/angiotensin receptor antagonist sparsentan (82.6%). Safety (36 studies reporting adverse events): The complement inhibitor iptacopan (88.4%) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) (85.4%) had the lowest incidence of adverse events, significantly better than immunosuppressive regimens. Conclusion: STE + RASI serves as a core therapeutic strategy for IgAN, significantly improving clinical remission rates, reducing the risk of ESRD or KD, and addressing proteinuria. Telitacicept, sparsentan, and TSP can be considered as enhanced options for specific phenotypic patients, while targeted ileal budesonide (Nefecon) has not demonstrated a significant renal protective advantage. Systematic review registration: CRD42023494801.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.