Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606439›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Stability of liver position in a shuttle-based workflow for daily online magnetic resonance imaging-guided particle therapy.

Friderike K Longarino, Una Maguire, Cedric Beyer, Rita Pestana, Sebastian Regnery, Jürgen Debus, Sebastian Klüter, Katharina Seidensaal, Julia Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Friderike K LongarinoClinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Una MaguireClinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Cedric BeyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rita PestanaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian RegneryDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian KlüterDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina SeidensaalDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia BauerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Online adaptive particle therapy makes it possible to consider interfractional changes during treatment, and therefore may lead to improved treatment outcomes. The advantages of online adaptive particle therapy may be realized with minimal workflow disruption by employing a shuttle-based daily quasi-online magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided strategy, where the patient remains in the treatment position on a transfer table for MRI at a diagnostic device and subsequent treatment delivery. This study investigated potential liver displacement and deformation while using a shuttle-based workflow. Material and methods: Fourteen healthy volunteers each underwent four MRI scans in a 1.5 T MRI scanner, with intra-hospital transport simulations between MRI scans. The study proceeded in the following steps: volunteer positioning, first MRI scan (MRI 1), ten-minute time control phase, second MRI scan (MRI 2), short transport phase, third MRI scan (MRI 3), long transport phase, and finally the last MRI scan (MRI 4). In each MRI set, the liver and relevant external outline were contoured. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) were calculated to quantify consecutive shifts between image sets and accumulative shifts over the course of the study. Results: Median MDA values for the liver (and for the external) contour were 0.6 mm (0.4 mm) for MRI 1 - MRI 2, 0.4 mm (0.5 mm) for MRI 2 - MRI 3, and 0.3 mm (0.7 mm) for MRI 3 - MRI 4. All subjects exhibited MDA values of <1.0 mm (<1.5 mm) and DSC values of >0.97 (>0.98) during transport phases. Outliers for the accumulative shift from MRI 1 - MRI 4 remained at <2.0 mm (<1.8 mm) after approximately 75 minutes. Conclusions: The study demonstrated the high stability of the liver position in a shuttle-based workflow, a finding that can be used to enhance MRI-guided adaptive treatment strategies in radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Daily online adaptive radiotherapyHepatocellular carcinomaMRI-guided particle therapyShuttle transfer

Identifiers

PMID40606439
PMCPMC12214252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.