Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606434›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025

Why We All Need to Shape the Profession of Behavior Analysis through Advocacy and How to Get Started.

Christine D Evanko, Tricia Moss-Lourenco, Rachel Kramer, Deborah A Napolitano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine D EvankoSnowflakes ABA, LLC, Mechanicsville, VA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8080-1523
Tricia Moss-LourencoNew Perspectives ABA and Psychological Services, New Hyde Park, NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-8761
Rachel KramerUnaffiliated, Grapevine, TX USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3629-7495
Deborah A NapolitanoDepartment of Behavioral Science, Daemen University, Amherst, NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1315-8563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many behavior analysts, like professionals in other health-related fields, are not trained to promote themselves, affect public policy, or disseminate information to individuals outside of their field, including to lawmakers. One of the reasons professionals can be experts in their own professions is because they devote their time to advancing their knowledge in their field; thus, they have limited time to spend becoming proficient in public relations, advocacy, and public policy. However, it is precisely these skills that behavior analysts need to hone and utilize effectively if the profession is to be sustainable. This article gives a brief history of the professionalization of behavior analysis, discusses the pitfalls of sometimes only being recognized as a single-disability industry (i.e. autism), explores the behavior of other professions that serve as models for advocacy, and provides recommendations for advocacy at different levels. The intent is to guide the profession and professionals of applied behavior analysis to a sustainable future based on the experiences of leaders of three U.S. state organizations.

Indexed as

AdvocacyLegislationNational associationsPublic policyState associations

Identifiers

PMID40606434
PMCPMC12209134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.