ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025
The Right to Effective Behavioral Treatment Revisited: Ethical Expectations for Behavior Analysts Today.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seven Dimensions Are Not Enough: Actively Disseminating Applied Behavior Analysis.Perspectives on behavior science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In their seminal work published in 1988, Van Houten and colleagues established foundational principles for the rights to effective behavior intervention, ensuring ethical and effective treatment for individuals with behavioral challenges. This revisitation of their pioneering article investigates the enduring relevance of these rights in contemporary practice and the evolving context shaping our considerations. Re-examining these principles reveals their continued pertinence and essential role in safeguarding the welfare of clients and their caregivers. In light of evolving therapeutic approaches and societal changes, it is crucial for behavior analysts to reaffirm their commitment to upholding these rights. By highlighting the challenges and barriers persisting in current practice, this paper aims to ignite a vital conversation within the field, fostering collaboration and innovation to identify solutions that protect the well-being and dignity of the individuals we serve. This re-evaluation underscores the ongoing importance of these rights and encourages practitioners to critically assess how they are applied today. By acknowledging the obstacles and dilemmas that clients, caregivers, and professionals encounter in contemporary practice, we can collectively work toward solutions that ensure the ethical and effective treatment of individuals with behavioral challenges. This paper is a call to action, emphasizing the need for a renewed commitment to these rights and inviting dialogue to drive progress in the field of behavior analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.