Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606402›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2025

Snack Confusion: Parents perceive baby, child and adult snacks as more similar than they actually are.

Alenica Hässig-Wegmann, Sergio Román, Luisma Sanchez-Siles, Michael Siegrist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alenica Hässig-WegmannETH Zurich, Department Health Science and Technology (D-HEST), Consumer Behaviour, Switzerland.
Sergio RománMarketing Department, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Luisma Sanchez-SilesInstitute for Research and Nutrition, Hero Group, 5600, Lenzburg, Switzerland.
Michael SiegristETH Zurich, Department Health Science and Technology (D-HEST), Consumer Behaviour, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of commercial snacks for infants and toddlers has risen significantly, yet limited research has explored how parents evaluate these products across age groups. This study examined parental perceptions of snacks marketed for babies (<36 months), children (commercial snacks with child-appealing packaging), and adults, focusing on attributes such as healthiness, appropriateness, and parental willingness to buy. It also assessed the relationship between parents' knowledge of the European Union (EU) baby food regulations and their purchasing intentions. An online survey was conducted with 704 parents in Germany. ANOVAs with Tukey post hoc tests were used to compare these measures across snacks for each age group. Additionally, Pearson correlations examined the relationship between food regulatory knowledge and buying intentions. Parents showed minimal differentiation in their evaluations of snack attributes across age groups, despite baby-specific snacks being subject to stricter limits on nutritional composition and contaminants. Our analysis also showed that parents were not fully aware of EU baby food regulations, particularly regarding restrictions on preservatives and pesticides, with 45.5 % and 52.5 % correct answers, respectively. While greater regulatory knowledge was moderately associated with a higher willingness to buy baby-specific snacks, correlations were weak, indicating a knowledge-behavior gap. These findings suggest the need for clearer labeling, stricter regulation of health claims, and educational efforts to help parents distinguish baby-specific food products and make informed choices aligned with stricter regulatory standards. Policymakers can support these efforts by ensuring regulations are effectively communicated and enforced.

Indexed as

Buying intentionsCommercial baby snacksEvaluationsFood regulatory knowledge

Identifiers

PMID40606402
PMCPMC12213931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.