ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
U-Net benign prostatic hyperplasia-trained deep learning model for prostate ultrasound image segmentation in prostate cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Convolutional neural networks for prostate cancer detection, classification, and segmentation: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis.European journal of radiology open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a leading cause of male morbidity and mortality globally, where transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) serves as the cornerstone imaging modality for diagnosis and therapeutic guidance. However, automated segmentation of prostatic anatomy in TRUS is persistently hindered by technical constraints. This study aimed to develop prostate segmentation model trained by deep learning from ultrasound images of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to verify if the developed model can be applied for the ultrasound image segmentation of patients with PCa. Methods: A total of 370 and 68 prostate ultrasound images were collected from 260 BPH patients and 62 PCa patients, respectively. U-Net, LinkNet and PSPNet neural network were used to train segmentation model. The Dice coefficients of the model segmentation for test set comprising BPH and PCa images were calculated. Two independent-sample Results: The study demonstrated significant radiomic differences between PCa and BPH in ultrasound imaging, with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression identifying 9 discriminative features including shape and texture parameters. The U-Net model achieved superior segmentation performance with a peak Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.9602 and maintained robustness across resolutions. The independent-sample Conclusions: We proved that prostatic segmentation model trained on ultrasound images of BPH could be applied in PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.