Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606379›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Characterization of brain metastases from lung cancer using percentagewise quantification of intratumoral susceptibility signals.

Linlin Sun, Jing Chen, Xuemei Liu, Huiyuan Zhu, Haiyang Dong, Guangyu Tao, Yifei Cao, Han Chu, Hong Yu, Qunhui Chen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linlin Sun *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0136-7942
Jing Chen *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xuemei Liu *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Huiyuan ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Haiyang DongDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guangyu TaoDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yifei CaoSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Han ChuShanghai Jianping High School, Shanghai, China.
Hong YuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qunhui ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8005-8629
Li ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-1729
Shihai LuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-0190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percentagewise quantification (PQ) of intratumoral susceptibility signals (ITSS) on susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) serves as an objective and quantitative method capable of differentiating some primary entities of brain metastases (BMs). We aimed to evaluate PQ of ITSS in BMs of different sizes in three main lung cancer subtypes, and explore if it can improve differential diagnosis in the context of lung cancer. Methods: In this retrospective study, 213 patients with synchronous BMs from lung cancer [141 adenocarcinoma (AD), 28 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 44 small cell lung cancer (SCLC)], who underwent routine brain contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced SWI (CE-SWI), were enrolled. The BMs were delineated on CE-SWI by mutual consent of two radiologists. All voxels within the lesion and voxels presenting values lower than those of the ventricular system were evaluated separately, and then ITSS were percentagewise calculated. The incidence of PQ <1% (no ITSS) and PQ of ITSS in Group 1 (micrometastases, ≤0.125 cm Results: The incidence of no ITSS in Group 1 was higher than that in Groups 2 and 3 in the three subtypes of lung cancer. BMs in Group 2 and Group 3 had higher PQ of ITSS than those in Group 1. In Group 3, PQ of ITSS in AD was higher than that in SCC (P=0.016) and in SCLC (P=0.010), while there was no difference between SCC and SCLC (P=0.921). Diagnostic performance of PQ of ITSS in Group 3 was good [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 0.98] to discriminate AD from non-AD. At a cut off value of 6.68%, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiation of AD and non-AD were 0.92 and 0.71, respectively. Conclusions: PQ of ITSS can contribute to the non-invasive characterization of BMs from the three subtypes of lung cancer. The larger lesions (middle metastases and macrometastases) of BMs were more likely to have positive ITSS and exhibited higher PQ of ITSS than small ones (micrometastases), and macrometastases of AD and non-AD can be distinguished with high sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Brain metastases (BMs)lung cancersusceptibility weighted imaging (SWI)

Identifiers

PMID40606379
PMCPMC12209704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.