Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606368›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for standard spleen volume prediction.

Jinyu Lin, Jian Yang, Yinling Qian, Xuanshuang Tang, Minheng Zhu, Wang Luo, Wenjun Lin, Mengjing Chen, Xianqing Zheng, Xiangdong Yuan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jinyu Lin *Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian Yang *The Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery I, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yinling Qian *Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xuanshuang TangShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Minheng ZhuThe Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery I, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wang LuoDepartment of General Surgery 2nd Division, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjun LinThe Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery I, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mengjing ChenThe Second Clinical School of Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xianqing ZhengThe Second Clinical School of Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangdong YuanDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Haisu TaoThe Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery I, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Splenomegaly serves as a crucial indicator for various diseases, particularly in hepatosplenomegaly and hematological disorders. Accurate assessment of splenomegaly is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment decisions, yet individualized diagnosis necessitates a standard reference for splenic volume. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to evaluate standard splenic volume (SSV), enhancing personalized clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,186 volunteers from a multicenter cohort and evaluated 11 ML algorithms. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed for feature selection and interpretation. Model performance was rigorously evaluated through key metrics such as root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R Results: Model development and internal validation involved 511 eligible volunteers, with external validation from an additional 111 volunteers. The random forest (RF) model (ML_SSV) integrating features such as age, body weight (BW), body height, body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), red blood cell count, platelet count, total bilirubin, fibrinogen, and D-dimer, demonstrated exceptional predictive accuracy. In external validation, the model achieved an RMSE of 22.6 mL (R Conclusions: This study establishes a novel interpretable ML model rigorously validated through statistical and clinical benchmarks. These models enable the assessment of SSV, providing a reference baseline for the individualized diagnosis of splenomegaly to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support data-driven clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

clinical decisionmachine learning (ML)predictive modelsplenomegalyStandard splenic volume (SSV)

Identifiers

PMID40606368
PMCPMC12209669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.