ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Random forest with preoperative core biopsy categories: a novel method for refining ultrasonic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System evaluation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification and establishment of diagnostic model in breast cancer diagnosis with automated breast ultrasound.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many benign breast lesions are classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4, resulting in unneeded biopsies. We thus aimed to build a model based on a core needle biopsy category (CBC) to improve upon BI-RADS classification by analyzing clinical and ultrasonic features. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in which female patients with solid breast tumors who underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to either a training or validation cohort at a 7:3 ratio. We developed CBC prediction models using five machine learning algorithms: support vector machine, random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression (LR), and k-nearest neighbors (KNNs). The optimal model was selected based on the highest area under the curve (AUC) value and subsequently applied to adjust the BI-RADS categories. The category of BI-RADS was downgraded by one if the CBC prediction was B1 or B2 or upgraded by one if the CBC prediction was B3 or B5. The number and rate of missed or accurate up- or downgrading were calculated. Results: A total of 1,082 female patients were included comprising 1,185 lesions. The optimal model was RF [AUC =0.943, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.930-0.956]. In 42 BI-RADS category 3 lesions, 4 (9.5%) cases were upgraded, 3 of which were correct, while 38 (90.5%) cases were downgraded, 37 of which were correct. In 167 BI-RADS category 4A lesions, 149 (89.2%) cases were downgraded, 145 of which were correct, while 18 cases (10.8%) were upgraded, 13 of which were correct. Conclusions: The predictive model of CBC built by RF can aid in adjusting BI-RADS category 3 and 4A and thus help prevent unnecessary biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.