Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606365›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Random forest with preoperative core biopsy categories: a novel method for refining ultrasonic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System evaluation.

Junhui Shen, Jieyi Huang, Xiaolu Ye, Lina Wu, Jiexin Wang, Fengjuan Chen, Xiaoya Zhou, Kebing Liu, Chunwang Huang, Ting Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junhui Shen *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jieyi Huang *Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaolu YeDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lina WuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jiexin WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Fengjuan ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoya ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Kebing LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chunwang HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ting LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many benign breast lesions are classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4, resulting in unneeded biopsies. We thus aimed to build a model based on a core needle biopsy category (CBC) to improve upon BI-RADS classification by analyzing clinical and ultrasonic features. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in which female patients with solid breast tumors who underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to either a training or validation cohort at a 7:3 ratio. We developed CBC prediction models using five machine learning algorithms: support vector machine, random forest (RF), multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression (LR), and k-nearest neighbors (KNNs). The optimal model was selected based on the highest area under the curve (AUC) value and subsequently applied to adjust the BI-RADS categories. The category of BI-RADS was downgraded by one if the CBC prediction was B1 or B2 or upgraded by one if the CBC prediction was B3 or B5. The number and rate of missed or accurate up- or downgrading were calculated. Results: A total of 1,082 female patients were included comprising 1,185 lesions. The optimal model was RF [AUC =0.943, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.930-0.956]. In 42 BI-RADS category 3 lesions, 4 (9.5%) cases were upgraded, 3 of which were correct, while 38 (90.5%) cases were downgraded, 37 of which were correct. In 167 BI-RADS category 4A lesions, 149 (89.2%) cases were downgraded, 145 of which were correct, while 18 cases (10.8%) were upgraded, 13 of which were correct. Conclusions: The predictive model of CBC built by RF can aid in adjusting BI-RADS category 3 and 4A and thus help prevent unnecessary biopsy.

Indexed as

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)breast solid tumorcore biopsy categoriesrandom forest (RF)Ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40606365
PMCPMC12209627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.