Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606355›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Deep learning for automated grading of radiographic sacroiliitis.

Xinyi Meng, Yongku Du, Rongrong Jia, Qing Zhou, Yuwei Xia, Feng Shi, Fanhui Zhao, Yanjun Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Year in Review: Axial Spondyloarthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinyi MengXi'an Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disease Imaging, Xi'an No. 3 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0669-9981
Yongku DuRadiology Department, Xi'an No. 5 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Rongrong JiaXi'an Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disease Imaging, Xi'an No. 3 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Qing ZhouDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Yuwei XiaDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Feng ShiDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Fanhui ZhaoXi'an Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disease Imaging, Xi'an No. 3 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Yanjun GaoXi'an Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disease Imaging, Xi'an No. 3 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Grading assessment of sacroiliitis via X-ray is widely used in clinical evaluation. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) system to help physicians in assessing and diagnosing sacroiliitis from standard X-ray images. Methods: In this retrospective study, a deep learning model for the automated grading assessment of radiographic sacroiliitis was developed using pelvic X-ray images from a training set of 465 individuals (930 single sacroiliac joints) and a validation set of 195 individuals (390 single sacroiliac joints). The algorithm was tested using an external test set of 223 individuals (446 single sacroiliac joints). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity to assess the model's performance. The findings of the model were used as a reference to determine its utility in aiding radiologists in the diagnosis and grading assessment of sacroiliitis. Results: The neural network model demonstrated proficiency in assessing grading of sacroiliitis. In the external test set, the model achieved a grading accuracy rate of 63.90% for radiographic sacroiliitis, and its diagnostic accuracy for determining the presence of radiographic sacroiliitis reached 90.13%. With the assistance of the model, the diagnostic accuracy of radiological sacroiliac arthritis by two junior imaging physicians improved significantly, increasing from 92.45% and 91.10% to 97.17% and 95.29%, respectively. Furthermore, the accuracy of image grading (grades 0 to 4) also showed notable improvement, rising from 75.00% and 74.08% to 88.89% and 80.90%, respectively. Conclusions: The AI model demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and can greatly enhance the precision of radiographic sacroiliitis grading.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Deep learninggrading assessmentradiographic sacroiliitisX-ray images

Identifiers

PMID40606355
PMCPMC12209610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.