Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606354›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Magnetic resonance imaging findings, prognosis, and treatment of fetal ovarian cysts.

Yi Zhang, Rui Yan, Le Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi ZhangMedical Image Centre, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Rui YanMedical Image Centre, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Le LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the widespread use and promotion of prenatal diagnosis, the detection of fetal ovarian cysts (FOCs) has become prevalent. However, there is limited research on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of these cysts. The aim of this study was to analyze the MRI features of FOCs to enhance diagnostic accuracy, and discuss their prognosis and treatment options. Methods: A total of 22 cases of FOCs were retrospectively collected in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2024. The MRI findings, prognosis, and treatment were analyzed. Results: In the included cases, the gestational age of initial diagnosis of cysts ranged from 30 to 37 weeks. Most (21/22, 95%) cases involved unilateral cysts, whereas 1 case had bilateral cysts. Among them, there were 14 simple cysts and 8 complex cysts with maximum diameter ranging from 20 to 96 mm. All cysts showed hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI). Simple cysts showed uniform hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). Of the 8 cases of complex cysts, 5 showed mixed signal intensity on T2WI and 3 had fluid-fluid level. There was no statistical difference in the maximum diameter of the cysts and the number of non-operative cases between two groups. However, a significant difference in cyst diameter was observed between the operation group and the non-operation group, with a critical threshold diameter of 5.8 cm. Conclusions: MRI findings of FOCs are varied, especially in complex cysts. The prognosis and treatment of FOCs mainly depends on the size and dynamic changes of the cyst. If the cyst is smaller than 5 cm, it will disappear spontaneously. Otherwise, it should be operated on in time to preserve the ovarian tissue maximumly and avoid autoamputation of the ovary.

Indexed as

Fetal ovarian cysts (FOCs)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)prognosis

Identifiers

PMID40606354
PMCPMC12209642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.