ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Deep learning-based rotational object detection algorithm for automatic Cobb angle measurement in X-ray images of scoliosis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-stage anatomical perception and reasoning framework for automated cobb angle estimation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scoliosis, characterized by an abnormal curvature of the spine, poses significant physiological challenges during adolescent growth and development. The Cobb angle measurement is regarded as the clinical gold standard for assessing the severity of scoliosis. The measurement of the Cobb angle has been extensively investigated through advanced neural network models; however, accurately measuring the Cobb angle remains challenging due to difficulties in detecting rotational vertebral objects. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an enhanced model that improves the detection of rotational vertebrae, thereby increasing the accuracy of Cobb angle measurements for more reliable scoliosis assessment. Methods: This study employed a redesigned YOLOv8-DSF model based on the YOLOv8n-oriented bounding box (OBB) framework, equipped with innovative modules to improve the detection of rotational objects. The method involves detecting vertebrae with rotational bounding boxes using the model and subsequently calculating the Cobb angle based on these detections. The model was tested and evaluated on a custom-built dataset that integrates private and publicly available data, all of which were enhanced through rigorous screening and augmentation processes. Results: The experimental findings demonstrated that the model achieved an mAP calculated with an Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.50 (mAP50) score of 0.626 and an mAP calculated with an IoU range of 0.50 to 95 (mAP50-95) score of 0.424, both exceeding the baseline by over 10%. In assessing Cobb angle accuracy, the model achieves a symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE) of 8.43 and an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 5.09 across the three Cobb angles. When tested on a public dataset for Cobb angle prediction accuracy, YOLOv8-DSF also demonstrated excellent performance. Conclusions: Given that the model outperformed both the baseline and other existing methods in detecting rotational vertebral objects and calculating the Cobb angle, it contributes to more accurate scoliosis assessments. This advancement holds significant potential for clinical applications in scoliosis evaluation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.