ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Predicting malignant cerebral edema after acute ischemic stroke: a machine-learning model with multi-region radiomics.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Diffusion-Weighted MRI Analysis for Exploratory Risk Stratification of Malignant Cerebral Edema After Acute Ischemic Stroke.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a multimodal nomogram integrating clinical, imaging, and laboratory data to predict malignant brain edema after reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant cerebral edema (MCE) is a severe complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) that is associated with poor outcomes or death. The study sought to develop a predictive machine learning (ML)-based model for MCE following AIS using radiomics features from non-contrast computed tomography images of the infarct lesion (IL), the affected hemisphere (AH), and the whole brain (WB). Methods: A total of 219 AIS patients from four centers were included in this study. Patients from Centers 1, 2, and 3 were allocated to a training cohort and a test cohort by stratified randomization at a ratio of 8:2, while those from Center 4 were allocated to an independent external validation cohort. Radiomics features of the IL, the AH, and the WB were extracted. After the feature selection process, the radiomics features related to MCE were identified. Using seven distinct ML algorithms, an IL model based solely on IL radiomics features, and a combined IWA model that incorporated IL, AH, and WB radiomics features were developed. The performance of the models were assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) value. Results: The IWA model demonstrated effectiveness in predicting MCE risk, with the multilayer perceptron-based model achieving particularly high performance. The IWA model had a higher AUC than the IL model (0.927 Conclusions: This study developed a novel IWA model that was able to effectively predict the risk of MCE following AIS and was superior to the IL model. It is expected that our model will provide more precise guidance recommendations for clinical treatment in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.