ArticleHealth science reports2025
Daily Diary Smartphone Assessment of Subjective Cognitive Concerns in Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: A Pilot Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aims: Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), a predementia condition that combines slow gait speed and subjective cognitive concerns (SCC), has broad diagnostic accessibility in resource poor settings as it is inexpensive and simple to diagnose. The ability to diagnose MCR remotely via smartphone would further increase the convenience and applicability of this syndrome. In this pilot study, we investigated the feasibility of implementing daily dairy reported SCC via smartphone in diverse individuals with MCR. Study aims included: (1) examine smartphone SCC to detect clinical status in MCR, (2) investigate the association of smartphone SCC with traditional in-clinic SCC measures; and (3) compare the relative ability of smartphone and in-clinic SCC to detect clinical status in MCR. Methods: Einstein Aging Study participants ( Results: Smartphone and in-person SCC measures were highly correlated. We found significant associations between SCC and clinical status for both smartphone and in-person SCC measures in MCR. Linear mixed-effects models revealed similar associations between smartphone-based and in-person SCC with clinical status. Conclustion: Results represent a step toward viability of remote, smartphone-based assessment of SCC in MCR. Findings illustrate the merit of future research exploring a fully remote MCR diagnosis, with implications for dissemination of MCR in underserved, remote settings and more equitable access to early dementia detection in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.