ArticleOncology letters2025
Integrative machine learning reveals the biological function and prognostic significance of α-ketoglutarate in gastric cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) has a poor response to treatment, an unfavorable prognosis and a lack of reliable biomarkers for predicting disease progression and therapeutic outcomes. α-Ketoglutarate (α-KG) is a critical metabolite involved in cellular energy metabolism and epigenetic regulation during tumor development, which has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker for GC. The present study aimed to explore this potential using publicly available datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases to analyze α-KG-related genes and establish the α-KG Index (AKGI). By assessing the predictive performance of the AKGI model, the results demonstrated its capability to predict survival outcomes in patients with GC. Notably, high AKGI scores were associated with worse prognoses. Building on these findings, the associations between AKGI and clinical variables, immune cell infiltration and tumor mutation characteristics were assessed, further identifying potential therapeutic drugs for patients with high AKGI scores. Additionally, by analyzing signaling pathways and biological functions correlated with AKGI, the regulatory mechanisms and biological roles of α-KG in GC were elucidated. The findings of these analyses were further evaluated using cellular experiments, where α-KG treatment was demonstrated to significantly inhibit GC cell proliferation, migration and invasion. In conclusion, the present study successfully constructed and validated the AKGI as a potential prognostic biomarker for GC. The findings indicate that AKGI can identify patients likely to benefit from immunotherapy, enhance diagnostic precision and improve clinical outcomes in GC management. Moreover, AKGI offers a valuable framework for advancing the understanding of the role and mechanisms of α-KG in GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.