Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606298›Full record

ReviewJHLT open2025

Sizing in lung transplantation: principles, practices and ideas for the future.

Michael Eberlein, Robert M Reed, Eric Abston, Roy Brower, Matthew G Hartwig, Yu Xia, Daniel P McCarthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael EberleinDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Robert M ReedDivision of Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD.
Eric AbstonMassachusetts General Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Boston, MA.
Roy BrowerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Matthew G HartwigDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Yu XiaDivsion of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Daniel P McCarthyDivsion of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung transplantation (LTx) is an important treatment option for many end-stage lung diseases. The goal of LTx is to restore pulmonary physiology (gas exchange and respiratory system mechanics) towards normal, so that LTx recipients can experience an improved quality of life and live significantly longer. An optimized approach to donor-to-recipient size matching is a strategy to increase opportunities for successful transplants and optimize outcomes. In this review we discuss relevant pulmonary gas exchange and respiratory systems mechanics principles as a framework to optimize donor-to-recipient size matching and LTX-recipient management. The predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) is a refined estimate of organ size utilizing regression equations to calculate lung size based on height, sex and age. In general, irrespective of the underlying lung disease the chest cavity is "reverse remolding" back towards normal size in most recipients. The parameter that can reflect the sizing goal to restore physiology towards normal is the recipient pTLC. A pragmatic size matching metric is the donor-to-recipient pTLC-ratio. Significant undersizing based on the pTLC-ratio is a risk factor for complications and lower LTx survival. If significant changes to the LTx candidate's chest cavity size occur (as can occur in severe restrictive lung disease or severe emphysema), or if the chest cavity cannot "reverse remodel" towards normal, it is important to consider additional donor-to-recipient sizing metrics. In addition to the recipient's measured actual total lung capacity imaging-based metrics can be considered. Chest X-ray and computer tomography based volumetric analyses can provide information facilitating a successful LTx.

Indexed as

DonorLung physiologyLung transplantationMatchingSizing

Identifiers

PMID40606298
PMCPMC12221432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.