Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606294›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2025

The value of systematic study and biobanking of explanted hearts: Insights from an international ISHLT pathology survey.

Marny Fedrigo, Diego Perazzolo, Gerald J Berry, Annalisa Angelini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marny FedrigoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Diego PerazzoloDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Gerald J BerryDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Annalisa AngeliniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates global practices for managing explanted hearts, with a focus on tissue collection and biobanking protocols. A survey conducted through the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) assessed responses from centers across Europe, North America, and Other Countries. Results demonstrated significant variability in tissue sampling, grossing protocols, and storage practices. While 78.8% of centers had grossing protocols, fewer (73.1%) adapted sampling based on pathology. Fresh tissue collection was prevalent in 63.5% of centers, but volumes varied: North America led with higher sampling rates (10-25 samples per heart), while Europe and Other Countries collected fewer samples. Coronary artery sampling also showed regional differences. Fresh tissues enable advanced molecular studies, while fixed tissues remain fundamental for histopathology. Standardized global protocols for sampling, storage, and reporting could enhance the clinical and research value of explanted hearts, optimizing post-transplant care and driving innovation in cardiac medicine.

Indexed as

BiobankingExplanted heartHeart transplantationPathologySurvey

Identifiers

PMID40606294
PMCPMC12219514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.