Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606278›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Padel vs. tennis doubles: a comparison of performance demands and game attributes.

Rūtenis Paulauskas, Domantas Šakinis, Bruno Figueira

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rūtenis PaulauskasEducational Research Institute, Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Domantas ŠakinisEducational Research Institute, Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Bruno FigueiraEducational Research Institute, Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates differences in performance demands and match characteristics between padel and tennis doubles. Method: Eight national-level male players (age of 27.0 ± 7.4 years, height of 186.3 ± 7.7 cm, body mass of 81.5 ± 10.7 kg, training frequency of tennis 4.8 ± 1.6 and padel 4.9 ± 1.4 h/week) participated in a total of 12 simulated matches, consisting of six tennis doubles and six padel sessions. The sessions were analyzed to assess various performance and physiological metrics. Match analysis focused on rally duration, strokes per rally, and movement characteristics, measured through standardized methods. Statistical comparisons were conducted using linear mixed models to identify significant differences between performance demands and match characteristics that define Padel and Tennis players. Results: Results indicate that tennis involves greater movement distances, higher speeds, more sprints, and longer rest intervals between rallies. In contrast, padel matches featured a higher total number of rallies, more frequent volleys and ground strokes, and longer play durations. All variables compared between Tennis and Padel showed statistical differences ( Discussion: These findings highlight the importance of sport-specific training regimens tailored to the unique requirements of each sport. Practical applications include optimizing training to enhance endurance and tactical adaptability for Padel players, while emphasizing explosive power and recovery strategies for Tennis athletes.

Indexed as

external loadgroundstrokesralliesspeed zonesvolleys

Identifiers

PMID40606278
PMCPMC12213881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.