ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Impacts of dry swing intervention on bat speed and attack angle: an analysis of core intervention factors.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kinetic characteristics of Wushu Changbing PiJi: decoupling sex-specific adaptive strategies via functional principal component analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated the effects of dry swing intervention using differently weighted baseball bats on bat speed and attack angles during actual swing, simulating warm-up routines. Additionally, it explored core kinematic factors impacting subsequent bat speed and attack angles. Methods: Sixty-nine baseball players were allocated by stratified randomization into three groups-normal-weight, weight, and reduced-weight-within their respective age categories. Bat swing kinematics were collected using BLAST, while bodily kinematics were captured with Rebocap sensors. Differences between pre- and post-tests were analyzed, and core intervention factors were identified with an XGBoost model and SHAP-based additive explanations. Results: No significant bat speed differences were found, but attack angles varied significantly in the normal-weight bat group for 12-14 year-olds ( Discussion: Post-test attack angles were impacted by intervention elevation and inclination angles, particularly for non-long-term bats. Adolescent athletes with shorter training term should avoid weight or reduced-weight bats for warm-up swings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.