Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Impacts of dry swing intervention on bat speed and attack angle: an analysis of core intervention factors.

Hanyao Li, Gang Cheng, Tianfeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanyao LiSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Gang ChengSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Tianfeng ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated the effects of dry swing intervention using differently weighted baseball bats on bat speed and attack angles during actual swing, simulating warm-up routines. Additionally, it explored core kinematic factors impacting subsequent bat speed and attack angles. Methods: Sixty-nine baseball players were allocated by stratified randomization into three groups-normal-weight, weight, and reduced-weight-within their respective age categories. Bat swing kinematics were collected using BLAST, while bodily kinematics were captured with Rebocap sensors. Differences between pre- and post-tests were analyzed, and core intervention factors were identified with an XGBoost model and SHAP-based additive explanations. Results: No significant bat speed differences were found, but attack angles varied significantly in the normal-weight bat group for 12-14 year-olds ( Discussion: Post-test attack angles were impacted by intervention elevation and inclination angles, particularly for non-long-term bats. Adolescent athletes with shorter training term should avoid weight or reduced-weight bats for warm-up swings.

Indexed as

attack anglebat speeddry swing interventionintervention factormachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40606275
PMCPMC12213483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.