Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606250›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2025

Reassessing Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Vietnam: Insights from SCORE2 and the Original SCORE Model.

Tran Nguyen Phuong Hai, Nguyen Nhat Tai, Nguyen Minh Kha, Ly Quang Sang, Pham Thanh Truong Son, Ngo Minh Hung, Le Trung Nhan, Truong The Hiep, Hoang Van Sy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tran Nguyen Phuong HaiDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam.
Nguyen Nhat TaiDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam.
Nguyen Minh KhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City.Vietnam.
Ly Quang SangDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam.
Pham Thanh Truong SonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City.Vietnam.
Ngo Minh HungDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam.
Le Trung NhanDepartment of Outpatient, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Truong The HiepDepartment of General Planning, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Hoang Van SyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City.Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries like Vietnam. Risk stratification models such as the original SCORE model have been widely used to guide preventive strategies. Recently, the updated SCORE2 model has been developed to enhance prediction accuracy by incorporating non-fatal events and recalibration for different European regions. Objective: This study aims to compare the performance and applicability of SCORE2 versus the original SCORE in a Vietnamese population undergoing general health check-ups. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on individuals attending general health check-ups at Cho Ray Hospital, a leading tertiary hospital in Vietnam, from January 2024 to July 2024. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected to calculate cardiovascular risk scores using both the original SCORE and the updated SCORE2 models. Results: Among 477 individuals undergoing general health check-ups, 317 patients met the inclusion criteria with a median age of 54.5 years (IQR: 47-62) and 35% were male. Risk stratification using the original SCORE model classified 87.1% as low-to-moderate risk, 9.1% as high risk, and 3.8% as very high risk. In contrast, SCORE2 reclassified 48.6% as low-to-moderate risk, while high and very high-risk categories increased to 35.6% and 15.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). Notably, 122 out of 276 patients (44.2%) initially classified as low-to-moderate risk by SCORE were reclassified by SCORE2 into higher risk categories - 101 (high risk) and 21 (very high risk). Similarly, 58.6% (n = 17) of patients classified as high risk by SCORE were upgraded to very high risk by SCORE2. SCORE2 also identified more high and very high-risk individuals under 50 years old, particularly among male patients. Conclusion: Compared to the original SCORE model, SCORE2 significantly increased the detection of high and very high cardiovascular risk in Vietnamese individuals undergoing routine health check-ups. The findings suggest that SCORE2 may provide improved risk stratification, especially in younger and male populations, and may better support preventive cardiovascular strategies in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular riskgeneral health check-upprimary preventionrisk stratificationSCORESCORE2Vietnam

Identifiers

PMID40606250
PMCPMC12212282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.