Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606243›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2025

Using Machine Learning Technique in Managing Emergency Triage Flow.

Mohammed Almulhim, Dunya Alfaraj, Dina Alabbad, Faisal A Alghamdi, Mubarak A AlKhudair, Khalid A AlKatout, Saud A AlShehri, Amal Alsulaibaikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed AlmulhimEmergency Medicine Department, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Dunya AlfarajEmergency Medicine Department, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Dina AlabbadDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal A AlghamdiCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Mubarak A AlKhudairCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid A AlKatoutCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Saud A AlShehriCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Amal AlsulaibaikhEmergency Medicine Department, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Triage is a critical component of Emergency department care. Erroneous patient classification and mis-triaging are common in present triage systems worldwide. Therefore, several institutes worldwide have developed artificial intelligence-based algorithms that use machine learning approaches to sort and triage patients effectively. Objective: This study aims were to propose a machine learning model to predict the triage level for emergency medicine department patients and compare its performance to the standard nursing triage system. Methods: This retrospective pilot study collected the dataset of emergency department records from King Fahad Hospital of the University in khobar, between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. A sample of 998 randomly selected patients was included in this cohort. The machine learning model was trained using 10-fold cross-validation. Two experiments were conducted, including five triage levels, and the second combing triage levels 2, 3, 4, and 5. Results: The machine learning model achieved an accuracy of 84% in experiment 1 and 64% in experiment 2. The mis-triage rates of the machine learning model were significantly lower than those of the standard nursing triage system. Conclusion: The machine learning model achieved higher accuracy and lower mis-triage rates than the standard nursing triage system. Thus, the proposed machine learning model can be a helpful tool for emergency department triage, enabling more efficient and accurate patient management.

Indexed as

Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale Machine LearningEmergency Department Mis-triageRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID40606243
PMCPMC12212266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.