ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Construction of a risk prediction model for pulmonary infection in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage during the recovery phase based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction model for pulmonary infection risk in patients with cerebral hemorrhage and optimization of nursing intervention strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pulmonary infection (PI) remains a prevalent and severe complication in patients recovering from spontaneous deep subcortical intracerebral hemorrhage (deep SICH). Accurate prediction of PI risk is crucial for early intervention and optimized clinical management. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model for predicting PI risk in patients during the recovery phase of deep SICH and to investigate the contributions of individual risk factors through explainable artificial intelligence techniques. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 649 patients diagnosed with PI during the recovery phase of deep SICH between 2021 and 2023. The cohort was divided into a training set (70%, Results: Among 649 patients with deep SICH, no significant baseline differences were found between the training ( Conclusions: This study provides a high-performing and interpretable ML-based risk stratification tool for pulmonary infection in patients during the recovery phase of deep SICH. The integration of SHAP enhances clinical applicability by demystifying complex model outputs, thereby supporting individualized preventive strategies. These findings underscore the promise of explainable AI in advancing neurocritical care and call for prospective multicenter validation and real-time dynamic model adaptation in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.