ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for stroke-associated pneumonia in older adult hemorrhagic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) risk in older adult hemorrhagic stroke patients. Methods: A retrospective collection of older adult hemorrhagic stroke patients from three tertiary hospitals in Guiyang, Guizhou Province (January 2019-December 2022) formed the modeling cohort, randomly split into training and internal validation sets (7:3 ratio). External validation utilized retrospective data from January-December 2023. After univariate and multivariate regression analyses, four ML models (Logistic Regression, XGBoost, Naive Bayes, and SVM) were constructed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for training and internal validation sets. Model performance was compared using Delong's test or Bootstrap test, while sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score evaluated predictive efficacy. Calibration curves assessed model calibration. The optimal model underwent external validation using ROC and calibration curves. Results: A total of 788 older adult hemorrhagic stroke patients were enrolled, divided into a training set ( Conclusions: This study constructed and validated a risk prediction model for SAP in older adult patients with hemorrhagic stroke based on multi-center data. The results indicated that among the four machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, LR, SVM, and Naive Bayes), the LR model demonstrated the best and most stable predictive performance. Age, smoking, low GCS score, low Braden score, and nasogastric tube were identified as predictive factors for SAP in these patients. These indicators are easily obtainable in clinical practice and facilitate rapid bedside assessment. Through internal and external validation, the model was proven to have good generalization ability, and a nomogram was ultimately drawn to provide an objective and operational risk assessment tool for clinical nursing practice. It helps in the early identification of high-risk patients and guides targeted interventions, thereby reducing the incidence of SAP and improving patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.