ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Development and validation of an early predictive model for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a comparative study of logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Central Sensitization and Neuropathic Pain in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we aim to identify the predictive variables for hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) through machine learning algorithms, select the optimal model and predict the occurrence of HSP. Methods: Data of 332 stroke patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province from January 2022 to January 2023 were collected. After screening predictive variables by LASSO regression, three predictive models selected using the LazyPredict package, namely logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF), were established respectively. The performance parameters (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score) of the models were calculated, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the decision curve analysis (DCA) were plotted to compare the performance of the three models. An explainability analysis (SHAP) was conducted on the optimal model. Results: The RF model performed the best, with accuracy: 0.90, precision: 0.89, recall: 0.88, F1 score: 0.86, AUC-ROC: 0.94, and the range of the threshold probability in DCA: 7%-99%. Based on the SHAP analysis of the explainability of the RF model, the contribution degrees of the early HSP predictive variables from high to low are as follows: multiple injuries, shoulder joint flexion (p), biceps tendon effusion, sensory disorder, supraspinatus tendinopathy, subluxation, diabetes, and age. Conclusion: The RF prediction model has a good predictive effect on HSP and has good clinical explainability. It can provide objective references for the early warning and stratified management of HSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.