Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606124›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

Neurorehabilitation and white matter repair in traumatic spinal cord injury: a dialogue between clinical and preclinical studies.

Vito Antonio Baldassarro, Ilaria Baroncini, Laura Calzà, Francesca Ciardulli, Luca Lorenzini, Francesco Giuseppe Materazzi, Francesca Merighi, Corinne Quadalti, Lucia Ricci, Francesca Serafino and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vito Antonio Baldassarro *Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ilaria Baroncini *Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola (Bologna), Italy.
Laura Calzà *Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnologies (FaBiT), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca Ciardulli *Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola (Bologna), Italy.
Luca Lorenzini *Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco Giuseppe Materazzi *Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola (Bologna), Italy.
Francesca Merighi *Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research, Life Science and Health Technologies (CIRI-SdV), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Corinne Quadalti *Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnologies (FaBiT), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lucia Ricci *Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola (Bologna), Italy.
Francesca Serafino *Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola (Bologna), Italy.
Laura Simoncini *Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Imola (Bologna), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central nervous system (CNS) has very limited repair capabilities, and the functional adaptation/compensation after acute injuries is attributed to the significant plasticity of neural circuits, in particular at the synaptic level. However, neurons are only one of the cellular components of the CNS, with gray matter (GM) comprising around 50% of its structure, compared to white matter (WM), where oligodendrocytes (Ols) form the myelin sheath and ensure the isolation of axons for proper electrical conductivity elicited by action potentials. WM is characterized by two remarkable properties: myelin plasticity, defined as experience-induced changes in myelination that mediate long-lasting changes in neural circuit function, and myelin repair, which can be complete and functionally effective and represents the CNS's only true reparative capability. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), accounting for 5-8% of the total CNS cells, are responsible for myelin plasticity and repair. OPCs are generated during development, are widely distributed across both white and gray matter, and remain quiescent until appropriate stimuli, such as functional requests or injuries, arise. Under these conditions, endogenous OPCs, as well as new OPCs derived from the proliferation and differentiation of endogenous neural stem cells, migrate toward axons and differentiate into mature OLs capable of wrapping axons and forming the myelin sheaths. In this review article, we discuss WM plasticity and myelin repair through OPC-dependent endogenous regeneration within the context of spinal cord injury (SCI) and related neurorehabilitation approaches. Clinical data, such as imaging information, pertain to changes in WM during various phases of SCI and have been collected in different rehabilitation contexts. Preclinical data focus on physical stimuli that can enhance the myelin repair capacity of OPCs within the context of the oligo-axon unit. The potential role of myelin regeneration by endogenous stem/precursor cells is finally discussed in the context of regenerative neurorehabilitation for SCI.

Indexed as

myelin regenerationoligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs)regenerative neurorehabilitationspinal cord injurywhite matter (WM)

Identifiers

PMID40606124
PMCPMC12213358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.