Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606107›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Gauging public perceptions of military and police roles in US domestic pandemic response during COVID-19.

Evan Warren, Congruo Wang, Megan Rhodes, David P Polatty, Adam C Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evan WarrenCenter for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Congruo WangCenter for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Megan RhodesCenter for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
David P PolattyCenter for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Adam C LevineCenter for Human Rights and Humanitarian Studies, Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Militaries and police forces have been increasingly deployed in response to humanitarian crises and public health emergencies. Existing studies have largely been concentrated around international interventions, overlooking US domestic contexts and the perceptions of those receiving aid. Methods: In recognition of these gaps, this research involved a survey of 1,500 Americans to understand opinions toward the utilization of the US military and local law enforcement as COVID-19 domestic pandemic responders at an unprecedented scale. Results: A majority were complimentary of and comfortable with these armed actors' role in the response and supportive of involvement in future crises, with the military regarded more favorably than police. Trust in civilians, the military, and police is found to be role-based; favorability was inherently tied to the nature of services provided, whether healthcare, logistics, or enforcement-related. Perceptions were also strongly linked to one's vaccination status, political party affiliation, ideology, age, and gender. Underlying trust in civilian providers was evident, but often did not preclude one from favorable views of the military and law enforcement. Conclusion: Ultimately, these results have implications on domestic policy in future national crisis scenarios and highlight the need for further research exploring if sentiment holds steady beyond the realm of public health and pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Military PersonnelPolicePublic OpinionAdultFemaleHumansLaw EnforcementMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPerceptionSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTrustUnited StatesCiv-MilCOVID-19militaryNational Guardpandemicperceptionspoliceresponse

Identifiers

PMID40606107
PMCPMC12217939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.