ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Culturally responsive approaches to cultivate care and innovation among emerging public health leaders for ethical community engagement: perspectives informed through lived experience.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional methods of public health research, practice, and education continue to overlook the value of multidisciplinary approaches to research, practice, and training in addressing health problems. Students who graduate from public health programs gain insufficient exposure to other fields of study and lack the leadership skills to effectively navigate interprofessional teams. Generally, public health programs do not adequately prepare students to engage with scholars from other fields such as humanities, ethnic studies, gender studies, etc. whose dynamic perspectives have not traditionally been considered in public health frameworks. Students, thus, become professionals who are ill-equipped to apply transdisciplinary approaches that critically examine the complex landscape of social health determinants and evolving health crises. Moreover, emerging student leaders with intimate connections to communities of interest are forced to shed their identities to conform to public health "best practices." We aim to strengthen leadership development in public health programs through innovative research methods and collaborative pedagogies. We critique the conceptualization of "interdisciplinarity" within the public health field, demonstrate the potential of innovative methods to responsibly engage with culturally diverse communities, and propose strategies to strengthen community-researcher collaboration to foster more robust leadership skills among public health scholars. Our recommendations integrate diverse tools and resources from other fields of study that will achieve more equitable health solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.