Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606076›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Improving Chinese patients' autonomy in medical decision-making through policy frameworks.

Gaoyuan Zhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gaoyuan ZhaiLaw School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As rational organisms, human beings not only require a dignified existence in social relationships, but also require the ability to create themselves according to their own will and determine the development trajectory of their own lives. Medical decisions involve the patient's life, health, body and other factors that are most closely related to the person. Individuals with dignity should make their own medical decisions and decide according to their own wishes. In Chinese society, due to the profound influence of Confucianism, medical familism occupies an important position in the doctor-patient relationship. Under the medical familism model, medical decisions are not the patient's own private issues, but important matters that affect the future development of the entire family. When family members offer advice on medical decisions, in a positive sense they contribute overall wisdom to the patient's medical treatment; however, in a negative sense, this may be seen as compressing the patient's autonomy. In contemporary Chinese society, medical disputes occur frequently, and the harmonious doctor-patient relationship appears cracked. Improper exercise of medical decision-making is an important cause of many medical disputes. This article adopted the research methods of case analysis and comparative analysis. By analyzing the shortcomings of China's current policy framework on medical decision-making and combining the influence of traditional Confucianism on China's medical decision-making model, it proposed methods to improve China's policy framework in order to enhance patients' autonomy in medical decision-making.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingHealth PolicyPersonal AutonomyPhysician-Patient RelationsChinaConfucianismEast Asian PeopleHumansChinamedical decision-makingmedical familismpatient autonomypolicy framework

Identifiers

PMID40606076
PMCPMC12213781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.