ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
A Multicenter Study in Northern Italy to Evaluate the Impact of a Sepsis Bundle in Obstetric Settings: The SOS Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In 2018, Lombardy's Fight Against Sepsis in Obstetrics group developed a regional sepsis management bundle for obstetric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this bundle on maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes and on process measures. Methods: This multicenter, observational, retrospective study included data from pregnant and puerperal adult patients diagnosed with sepsis according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in 2 periods: May 2015 to May 2018 (prebundle) and July 2018 to January 2023 (postbundle). Results: Eighty women were included: 24 (30.0%) in the prebundle period and 56 (70.0%) in the postbundle period. The primary source of infection was urinary (40.0%), with Conclusions: The implementation of a regional maternal sepsis management bundle did not significantly alter maternal outcomes but was associated with a reduction in neonatal intensive care unit admissions, although what role bundle implementation had in this change remains uncertain. More infectious disease consultations postbundle highlight the potential role of the bundle increasing sepsis awareness among physicians dealing with these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.