ArticleWorld journal of radiology2025
Enhancing back pain and sciatica diagnosis: Coronal short tau inversion recovery's role in routine lumbar magnetic resonance imaging protocols.
Article in World journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBack pain and sciatica are common complaints that often require imaging for accurate diagnosis and management. Conventional lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols typically include sagittal and axial T1 and T2 sequences; however, these may miss certain pathologies. The addition of coronal short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences offers the potential to enhance the detection of both spinal and extra-spinal abnormalities, thereby improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.
aimTo evaluate the impact of adding coronal STIR sequences to routine lumbar MRI in diagnosing back pain and sciatica.
methodsWe prospectively analyzed data from patients aged 6 and older presenting with back pain or sciatica who underwent lumbar spine MRI at our institution. The standardized MRI protocol utilized included sagittal and axial T1 and T2 sequences, complemented by a coronal STIR sequence. Data on structural abnormalities were collected, reviewed, and analyzed using counts, percentages, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.
resultsOur cohort comprised 274 patients (115 males, 159 females; mean age 44.91 years). Notably, 39 patients exhibited abnormalities across all sequences, while 72.63% showed normal findings on the coronal STIR sequence. Importantly, 30.29% of cases were diagnosed as normal without the coronal STIR, and 36 patients with normal T1 and T2 sequences presented abnormalities on the coronal STIR. The coronal STIR sequence successfully identified 26 spinal and 10 non-spinal pathologies, including 17 cases of sacroiliitis, with a significant association (
conclusionIntegrating coronal STIR into routine lumbar MRI enhances detection of hidden spinal and extra-spinal pathologies, improves patient management, and offers a cost-effective, practical upgrade with significant diagnostic and clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.