Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40606037›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2025

Timely integration of palliative care into oncology care for patients with bone metastases at the radiotherapy department: A pilot study on acceptability and feasibility.

Anouk van Oss, Arianne Stoppelenburg, Ellen de Nijs, Rebecca van Jaarsveld, Carly S Heipon, Natasja J H Raijmakers, Yvette M van der Linden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anouk van OssCenter of Expertise for Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Arianne StoppelenburgCenter of Expertise for Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ellen de NijsCenter of Expertise for Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rebecca van JaarsveldCenter of Expertise for Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Carly S HeiponNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Natasja J H RaijmakersNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yvette M van der LindenCenter of Expertise for Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Patients with bone metastases may have needs that extend beyond the management of pain by radiotherapy. Concurrent palliative care leads to improved quality of life, but is often introduced late. In this pilot study, we assessed the acceptability and feasibility of an introdu0000ctory conversation with a palliative care consultant at referral for palliative radiotherapy. Material and methods: Patients with bone metastases and their family caregivers were scheduled for an introductory conversation with a consultant from the hospital palliative care team. During this meeting, the potential benefits of integrating palliative care into their current or future care was discussed. Using statements on a 5-point Likert scale, patients and family caregivers independently evaluated the acceptability of the conversation, and consultants evaluated the feasibility. Results: Between December 2022 and March 2024, 48 patients were included in the study. Median age was 73 years, 63 % were male. Most patients (89 %) and family caregivers (96 %) appreciated the introductory conversation, were unaware of the existence of a palliative care team (60 %, 67 %, respectively), and would contact the team when having questions or concerns (77 %, 82 %). Some found the conversation confronting (17 %, 11 %), or felt it was too early in the illness trajectory (31 %, 26 %). Follow-up consultations were scheduled for 8 patients (17 %). Consultants were able to conduct the conversation as instructed (91 %), though 15 % indicated insufficient time for preparation. Conclusion: Introductory conversations about palliative care at referral for palliative radiotherapy appear both acceptable and feasible, and may enhance timely integration of palliative care into oncology care for patients with bone metastases.

Indexed as

Bone neoplasmsCaregiversConsultantsFeasibility studiesPalliative carePatient acceptance of health care

Identifiers

PMID40606037
PMCPMC12214256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.