ArticleDigital health
"You can't categorize lived experiences": Understanding youth engagement in mobile health in an integrated youth services setting.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Youth mental health is a global challenge often compounded by fragmented services limiting access. In Canada, Integrated Youth Services (IYS) provide centralized access to youth health services, with youth engagement playing a key role during development and implementation. This study aims to identify key factors influencing youth engagement in mobile health (mHealth) development within an IYS setting. Methods: We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with youth, clinical service providers, and non-clinical staff involved in mHealth services at Foundry. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided deductive thematic analysis. Results: We identified key facilitators and barriers across five domains: Recognizing core value of engagement, improving external coordination, addressing internal organizational challenges, mitigating power imbalances, and tailoring implementation strategies. Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for inclusive approaches, regulatory frameworks, and strategies to engage underrepresented youth. Future efforts should prioritize iterative learning systems and safe, supportive spaces for meaningful youth engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.