Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605949›Full record

ArticleAffective science2025

Distress Tolerance as a Moderator of Affective Forecasting Effects.

Roscoe C Garner, Evan M Kleiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roscoe C GarnerDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1128-426X
Evan M KleimanDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8002-1167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has used real-time methods like ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine affective forecasting (predictions made regarding experience of affect and how this influences decision making, level of functioning, etc.), but has not specifically examined predictors of what determines how strongly daily forecasts of a day are associated with negative emotion experienced later in the day. The aim of this study was to examine how experience of distress tolerance would moderate daily-level affective forecasting effects. Our hypothesis stated that having poorer distress tolerance would mean that worse predictions of how good a day would be, would be more strongly associated with negative emotion later in the day. Analyses in a large sample of undergraduates (

Indexed as

Affective forecastingDistress toleranceEcological momentary assessmentNegative affect

Identifiers

PMID40605949
PMCPMC12209058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.