Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605945›Full record

ArticleAffective science2025

The Affective Science Network: A Fieldwide Map of over 1 Million Citations.

Alessia Iancarelli, Nicholas R Rypkema, Maureen Ritchey, Ajay B Satpute

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessia IancarelliDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, 125 NI, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Nicholas R RypkemaApplied Ocean Physics & Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole Rd, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
Maureen RitcheyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA.
Ajay B SatputeDepartment of Psychology, Core Faculty, Institute for Experiential Artificial Intelligence, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in affective science includes over one hundred thousand articles, the vast majority of which have been published in only the past two decades. The size and rapid growth of this field have led to unique challenges for the twenty-first-century scientist including how to develop both breadth and depth of scholarship, curb siloing and promote integrative and interdisciplinary framework, and represent and monitor the field in its entirety. Here, we help address these issues by compactly mapping out this enormous field using citation network analysis (CNA). We generated a citation matrix of over 100,000 publications and over 1 million citations since the seminal works on emotion by Charles Darwin (1872) and William James (1884). Using graph theory metric and content analysis of titles and abstracts, we identified and characterized the contents of 69 research communities, their most influential articles, and their interconnectedness with each other. We further identified potential "missed connections" between communities that share similar content but do not have strong citation-based connections. In doing so, we establish the first, low-dimensional representation, or field-wide map, of a substantial portion of the affective sciences literature. This panoramic view of the field provides affective and non-affective scientists alike with the means to rapidly survey dozens of major research communities and topics in the field, guide scholarship development, and identify gaps and connections for developing an integrative science.

Indexed as

Affective scienceBibliometricsCitation network analysisEmotionHistory

Identifiers

PMID40605945
PMCPMC12209489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.