Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40605886›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Massive Allograft Reconstruction in Limb Salvage Surgery: Insights From a Single-Institution Case Series in Malaysia.

Sanjeevan R, Wan Yuhana W Md Yusof, Ang Js, Prashant N, Azuhairy A

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanjeevan ROrthopedics and Traumatology, Penang General Hospital, George Town, MYS.
Wan Yuhana W Md YusofOrthopedics and Traumatology, Penang General Hospital, George Town, MYS.
Ang JsOrthopedics and Traumatology, Penang General Hospital, George Town, MYS.
Prashant NOrthopedics and Traumatology, Penang Adventist Hospital, George Town, MYS.
Azuhairy AOrthopedics and Traumatology, Penang General Hospital, George Town, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction With advances in imaging and oncological treatment, limb salvage surgery has become a preferred option in musculoskeletal oncology. As survival rates improve, reconstruction durability becomes critical. Massive bone allografts offer a biological solution that preserves bone stock and joint integrity, but they are associated with notable complications. This series aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of massive allograft reconstructions following tumor resections. Methods This is an observational and descriptive review of limb salvage surgeries performed at Penang General Hospital, Malaysia, between 2016 and 2023. It includes a total of 17 patients, comprising 16 individuals diagnosed with primary bone tumors, either malignant or benign but locally aggressive, and one patient who underwent revision surgery for aseptic loosening of a previously implanted prosthesis. All reconstructions were performed using fresh-frozen massive allografts (12 osteoarticular, 5 intercalary) sourced from the Universiti Malaya Medical Centre Bone Bank. Data were collected from medical records, radiographs, and follow-up visits, with limb function evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Follow-up ranged from 18 months to nine years. Results The cohort included 13 males and four females, with a mean age of 26.7 years (range: 7-71). Histological diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n = 9), Ewing's sarcoma (n = 3), chondrosarcoma (n = 3), and one giant cell tumor. The patient survival rate was 88.2% (n = 15) at a median follow-up of seven years (range: 3-9 years). Allograft union occurred in 12 cases (70.6%) with a mean time to union of 10.4 months. Four patients developed nonunion, three underwent revision surgery, and one was managed conservatively. Fractures occurred in three patients (17.6%), all requiring osteosynthesis. Infections were reported in three cases, all managed surgically; one case had a delayed onset at 50 months postoperatively. Local recurrence was seen in one patient, necessitating amputation. Seven patients (41.2%) required secondary surgery for complications. Allograft survival rate was 70.6%, and 53% of patients remained complication-free at final follow-up. The mean MSTS functional score (excluding two deceased patients) was 24. Conclusion Massive bone allografts remain a viable and durable option for reconstruction in limb salvage surgery following musculoskeletal tumor resection. Despite a 41.2% reoperation rate due to complications such as nonunion, fracture, and infection, long-term outcomes were acceptable, with satisfactory function achieved in the majority of patients. This method supports preservation of joint structures and bone stock, making it particularly beneficial for young patients with extended survival expectations. Careful patient selection and surgical planning are critical to optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

allograft union and healingbone allograft complicationsintercalary bone allograft outcomeslimb salvage surgerymassive bone allograftosteoarticular bone allograft outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40605886
PMCPMC12221098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.